State v. . Burton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was charged with violating chapter 347, Laws 1901, forbidding the sale or manufacture of spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors in Duplin County. Section 1 of the act concludes: "Provided, that this act shall not be so construed as to apply to wine or cider manufactured from grapes, berries, or fruit raised on the lands of the person so manufacturing the same." The bill of indictment charged the sale of vinous liquors. It contained no averment that the liquors sold were not manufactured from grapes raised on the lands of the defendant.
Defendant made a motion to quash, for that no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1829
- State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.