Legal Opinion

State v. Connor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1906PublishedCited by 25 opinions

INDICTMENT f or criminal elopement, beard by Judge Fred. Moore and a jury, at the April Term, 1906, of the Superior Court of Buncombe. There was a verdict of guilty and judgment, and defendant excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

Tbe statute under wbicb tbe conviction was bad, Revisa!, sec. 3360, is as follows:

“If any male person shall abduct or elope witb tbe wife of another, be shall be guilty of a felony, and upon conviction shall be imprisoned not less than one year nor more than ten years: Provided, that tbe woman, since her marriage, has been an innocent and virtuous woman: Provided, that no conviction shall be bad upon tbe unsupported testimony of any such married woman.”

Defendant, by exceptions properly noted, assigns for error:

1. That tbe Judge erred in charging tbe jury that tbe burden was on tbe defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AbbeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  2. State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. State v. . WilbourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. People v. DemoussetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. People v. SandgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API