Legal Opinion

State v. . Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1949PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendants assign as error the refusal of the Court below1 to grant their motion to cjuash the "warrants on the ground that the State has indicted them under inapplicable sections of the General Statutes.

The defendants contend that it was the intent of the Legislature to vest in the Utilities Commission, under Sections 62-109 and 62-118 of the General Statutes, the power to prescribe the rules and regulations with respect to the seating of passengers on public conveyances except in busses engaged in local transportation, wdthin cities and towns in the State. Consequently it is contended…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morgan v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. State v. . McNairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. State v. . NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1829

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Meekins v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API