Legal Opinion
State v. Pascal
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 8, 2008No. AC 27463PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, Brent Pascal, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, (2) the prosecutor engaged in impropriety that deprived him of a fair trial and (3) the court improperly instructed the jury on consciousness of guilt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On August 17, 2004, at approximately 10:30 a.m.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. MorantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SaezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. MoyeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. SaundersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. WeavingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.