Easley v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CATHERINE STONE, Justice.
Melvin Easley appeals from his conviction for murder. A jury convicted Easley and assessed his punishment at twenty-five years imprisonment. In ten points of error, Easley complains that the trial court made several erroneous evidentiary rulings, that he was prosecuted under a tardily presented indictment, and that the State failed to investigate mitigating circumstances in violation of a pre-trial order. Easley also contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction. For the following reasons, we affirm Easley’s…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Roberson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Jensen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Young v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Jeffley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.