Legal Opinion

Black v. Funk

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1914No. 18,984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Brown district court; William I. Stewart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action in the district court was one to contest the will of Mattie J. Adams. The grounds of invalidity relied on were mental incapacity of the testatrix and fraud and undue influence practiced on her by Ralph L. Funk. The court sustained the will except as to certain provisions in favor of Funk. These were set aside as having been induced by his undue influence and fraud, and he appeals.

Funk was the physician of the testatrix for several years before her death, and was also her attorney in fact for the transaction of her business. He…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ShapterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. In re Young's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In re Downing's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Kern v. KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Coates v. SemperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cranston v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. In Re Wilkins' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Hugo v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Chicago Lumber Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Mingle v. HubbardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API