Legal Opinion

Leuning v. Hill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1971No. 41234PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, C.J.

Three issues seek resolution by this appeal. The first presents a question of initial impression in this state, the second a factual dispute, and the third revolves about an evidentiary ruling.

Respondent, Adgie Leuning, individually and as personal representative of the estate of her deceased husband, W. C. Leuning, instituted this action seeking recovery from appellants, Marvin and Noriene Hill, of moneys paid by her husband’s insurer, under a group credit life insurance policy, in satisfaction of a debt evidenced by a promissory note signed by Mr. Hill and Mr. and Mrs. Leuning.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Betts v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Hatley v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Kincaid v. AldersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Handsaker v. PedersenWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. La-Rey, Inc. v. KowalskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dominski v. GarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Honey v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Honey v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fithian v. JamarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API