Legal Opinion · Dissent

Payne, County Treas. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1944No. Nos. 29934, 29935Published

1Dissent

GIBSON, V. C. J.

(dissenting). The statement in the majority opinion to the contrary notwithstanding, the record in this case discloses that these appeals have become moot. This court also knows that fact from verbal statements made by the plaintiff in error in his lifetime and by counsel in the cases.

In Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. et al. v. State, 43 Okla. 368, 143 P. 37, we said:

“It is well settled that the Supreme Court will not decide abstract or hypothetical cases, disconnected from the granting of actual relief, or from the determination of which no practical relief can follow. C., R. I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. Territory Ex Rel. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. TerritorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Sneed, Register of Deeds v. State Ex RelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Davis v. HumbargerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API