Legal Opinion

People v. Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1982PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

Hancock, Jr., J.

The use of hypnosis has not gained general acceptance in the scientific community as a reliable method of restoring a witness’ recollection of an event. We hold, therefore, that the testimony of a witness concerning hypnotically produced recall is, as a matter of law, inadmissible in a criminal trial in this State.

i

Whether such testimony should be admitted, a question apparently not before considered in any appellate court in New York, arises in the context of an appeal from convictions for rape, first degree, burglary, first degree, and assault, second…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. People v. MiddletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. KaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API