Legal Opinion

State v. Peoples

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 28, 1984No. 106PA83PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

The crux of the present case concerns the admissibility of testimony by a witness who undergoes hypnosis prior to testifying. Defendant challenges the trial court’s admission of a witness’s hypnotically refreshed testimony and of a video tape recording of the hypnotic session. We find error in both rulings and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I

In the early morning hours of 26 May 1980, Bruce Crockett Miller participated in the armed robbery of the Borden Chemical Plant in Fayetteville, North Carolina. He, along with two other men, took several buckets of almost pure…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API