Legal Opinion

Maryland Insurance Administration v. Maryland Individual Practice Ass'n

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 1999No. 160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EYLER, Judge.

The two-part issue presented by this appeal, one of first impression, is whether (1) claims for payment submitted by a health care provider to a health maintenance organization (“HMO”) that are subject to a pending workers’ compensation claim are “payable by workers’ compensation” within the meaning of an exclusion in the health plan and (2) whether, *352pursuant to Md.Code (1996 Repl.Vol., 1998 Cum.Supp.) §§ 19-710.1 and 19-712.1 of the Health-General II Article, they must be paid within thirty days regardless of the answer to (1). We hold that a claim comes within such an exclusion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Gill Simpson ElectricCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Bennett v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Bd. of Education v. SandersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. United Parcel Service v. StrothersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API