Legal Opinion

DeHanes v. Rothman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 19, 1999PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

This appeal concerns the right of an attorney during summation to suggest to a jury an aggregate sum or “bottom-line” figure to award for a claim of unliquidated economic damages. Specifically, the question is whether it was proper in this wrongful death action for the attorney for a decedent’s surviving spouse and children to argue to the jury that the family had suffered a loss of approximately $2 million, of which $1.5 million represented income anticipated to be earned over the remaining years of the interrupted life of their husband and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Curtis v. FinneranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Polzo v. County of EssexSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. Brodsky v. Grinnell Haulers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. State v. BealorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. Voilas v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  5. Kuehn v. Pub ZoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API