Legal Opinion

State v. Bealor

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 2006PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

N.J.SA 39:4-50 does not prohibit solely the “operation of] a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor[.]” The driving while intoxicated statute also prohibits the “operation of] a motor vehicle while under the influence of ... narcotic, hallucinogenic or habit-producing drug[s.]” Framed in the latter context, this appeal requires that we address whether lay opinion is sufficient to prove the offense of driving while intoxicated when the intoxicating agent is marijuana and not alcohol, or whether additional expert opinion is required.

We hold that, although evidentially…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. State v. JenewiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. State v. Julie KuropchakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. GerhardtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  5. State v. HymanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API