Legal Opinion

Baird v. Bellotti

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 6, 1984No. Civ. A. 74-4992-ZPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZOBEL, District Judge.

This case and, in particular, the petition for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 of plaintiff-intervenor, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts (“PPLM”), comes before me after a long history in both this court, 555 F.Supp. 579 (D.Mass.1982), and the Court of Appeals. That history has been fully recounted in opinions by both courts. Neither repetition nor further elucidation is necessary. It remains only to evaluate the services rendered by counsel for PPLM to establish the fee payable for such services and to award that fee. The parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William Baird v. Francis X. Bellotti, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, William Baird v. Francis X. BellottiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Baird v. BellottiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. AriyoshiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1989
  2. Wilkinson v. ForstDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
  3. Gres v. Value Rent A Car, Inc., Florida County Courts1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API