Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Rose
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
This appeal is prosecuted from a decree granting a reformation of two insurance policies and awarding a recovery upon the policies, as reformed.' The errors assigned and argued relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree, and to the entry of a judgment upon one of the policies without a jury trial. The appellant, the Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Company, issued two fire insurance policies to William Rose, the appellee. One policy was upon a frame dwelling house, and the other was upon household goods contained therein.
Each policy contained a clause…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Eagle Star & British Dominions v. TadlockDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Southwestern Graphite Co. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Jewel Tea Co. v. Eagle Realty Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1947
- Barnes v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1956