Legal Opinion

Meyer v. City of Eufaula, Okl.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1946No. 3209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Joe Meyer, as the holder of certain street improvement bonds issued by the City of Eufaula, Oklahoma, brought this action for a money judgment against the City for the amount of unpaid installments of assessments levied against property owned by the City in the paving district, plus interest and penalties. The trial court applied the three year statute of limitations as a bar to the maintenance of the suit and entered judgment accordingly. The question presented by this appeal is whether the instant facts are distinguishable on principle from our decision in Versluis v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Emerson v. TreadwayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. Irene Essley, Irene Essley, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Wolfe v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Selectmen of the Town of Nahant v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
  5. Superior Business Assistance Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API