Legal Opinion
United States v. Bourseau
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 14, 2008No. 19-17362PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Robert I. Bourseau (“Bourseau”), RIB Medical Management Services, Inc. (“RIB”), Dr. Rudra Sabaratnam (“Sabaratnam”) and Navatkuda, Inc. (“Navatkuda”) (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the district court’s judgment holding them jointly and severally liable to the United States (“government”) for violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. We affirm.
I
The parties agree that the underlying facts are not in dispute. The government brought this case on behalf of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Allison Engine Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. United Healthcare Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- US Ex Rel. Geraldine Godecke v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Longhi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.