Legal Opinion

Ames v. Kirby

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 29, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pitney, J.

In making return to a writ of habeas corpus the sheriff of Atlantic county sets up as a justification for his detention of the petitioner two writs of commitment, issued by a justice of the peace, setting forth that the petitioner is charged respectively with violations of sections 59 and 65 of the Grimes act of 1898 (Pamph. L., pp. 810, 812) and is committed to the sheriff in default of bail to await the action of the *443grand jury. Petitioner prays for his discharge — first, on the ground that the commitments, respectively, do not set forth…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Brielle v. ZeiglerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Simpson-Crawford Co. v. Borough of Atlantic HighlandsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1908
  4. State v. J. W. Kelly & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. MaloneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API