Sherman v. Human Rights Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH
Petitioner Tanja Sherman filed a charge of sex discrimination and sexual harassment against her employer, Quincy Country Club (Club) with the Department of Human Rights (Department). Following the first administrative hearing, the Illinois Human Rights Commission (Commission) adopted the findings of the administrative law judge (ALJ) and issued a decision in favor of petitioner. (In re Sherman (1983), 10 Ill. HRC Rep. 381.) On administrative review, this court reversed the Commission because the findings of the ALJ were based on credibility determinations made by a prior ALJ who resigned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Bultas v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Department of Corrections v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Irick v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Davis v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Pinnacle Ltd. Partnership v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- State of Illinois, Department of Central Management Services v. State of Illinois, Illinos Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.