Legal Opinion

Irick v. Human Rights Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 3, 2000No. 4-98-0993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Petitioner, Gene A. Irick, filed a complaint with the Illinois Department of Human Rights alleging that respondent, Christie Clinic (Clinic), had fired him because of his age and sex. The Clinic responded that Irick had been fired because he sexually harassed a student intern. An administrative law judge (ALJ) conducted a public hearing in February 1993. In November 1998, the Illinois Human Rights Commission (Commission) dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Irick appeals. We conclude the Commission’s decision is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, and we reverse and remand.

I.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deen v. LustigAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Speed District 802 v. WarningAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Pinnacle Ltd. Partnership v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Schwartz v. Illinois Human Rights Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  5. Champaign-Urbana Public Health District v. Illinois Human Rights Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API