Legal Opinion

Benesch v. Village of Clayton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously vacated, determination confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Because petitioner’s CPLR article 78 proceeding presented a substantial evidence question, it should have been transferred to this court (see, CPLR 7804 [g]; Matter of Melvin v Kelly, 126 AD2d 956, lv denied 69 NY2d 609; Matter of Rivera v Beekman, 86 AD2d 1). Village Law § 8-806, pursuant to which the hearing was conducted, provides that the conviction of a member of a village police force shall be reviewed "in the manner provided by” CPLR article 78. Supreme Court, therefore, improperly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rivera v. BeekmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Melvin v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Johnson v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Price v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Hosmer v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Keuning v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Lynch v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. McCrimmon v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API