Legal Opinion

Keuning v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously vacated without costs, determination confirmed *1034and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The petitioner in this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenges respondents’ determination, made after a fair hearing, to discontinue petitioner’s home relief and medical assistance benefits because she made a voluntary transfer of a resource for the purpose of qualifying for those. benefits (see, Social Services Law § 158 [b]; 18 NYCRR 370.2 [c] [6] [i]). Because the petition seeks review of a determination made after a quasi-judicial hearing required by law, at which evidence was adduced,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benesch v. Village of ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Johnson v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Molloy v. BaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. DeLuca v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Estate of MaierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1998
  4. In re the Estate of LittleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1997
  5. Kirwin v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API