Jaster v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiffs, diversion investigators for the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), seek overtime compensation for time spent driving between home and work in their government-issued vehicles. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Because applicable statutes do not authorize overtime compensation for Plaintiffs’ commuting time, Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted.
Background1
Plaintiffs Paul G. Jaster, Richard S. Leakey,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oxy USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022