Legal Opinion

Jaster v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 17, 2009No. 07-299CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Plaintiffs, diversion investigators for the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), seek overtime compensation for time spent driving between home and work in their government-issued vehicles. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Because applicable statutes do not authorize overtime compensation for Plaintiffs’ commuting time, Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted.

Background1

Plaintiffs Paul G. Jaster, Richard S. Leakey,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oxy USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API