Schechet v. Kesten
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The statute which precludes that which the circuit court ordered answered upon discovery-interrogatory has remained unchanged — certainly in presently applicable substance — since Storrs v. Scougale, 48 Mich 387, was decided in 1882 (See CL 1871, § 5943; CL 1897, § 10181; CL 1915, § 12550; CL 1929, § 14216; CL 1948, § 617.62 [Stat Ann § 27.911]; RJA, PA 1961, No 236, § 2157 [CLS 1961, § 600.2157 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.2157)]).
In the Storrs Case, an action to set aside as fraudulent certain conveyances of real and personal property executed by plaintiff James R. Storrs (otherwise known as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grattan v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Edington v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Briggs v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Storrs v. ScougaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Swickard v. Wayne County Medical ExaminerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Geisberger v. WilluhnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Gaertner v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.