Legal Opinion

Schechet v. Kesten

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1964No. Calendar 71, Docket 50, 236PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The statute which precludes that which the circuit court ordered answered upon discovery-interrogatory has remained unchanged — certainly in presently applicable substance — since Storrs v. Scougale, 48 Mich 387, was decided in 1882 (See CL 1871, § 5943; CL 1897, § 10181; CL 1915, § 12550; CL 1929, § 14216; CL 1948, § 617.62 [Stat Ann § 27.911]; RJA, PA 1961, No 236, § 2157 [CLS 1961, § 600.2157 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.2157)]).

In the Storrs Case, an action to set aside as fraudulent certain conveyances of real and personal property executed by plaintiff James R. Storrs (otherwise known as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grattan v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Edington v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Briggs v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Storrs v. ScougaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Swickard v. Wayne County Medical ExaminerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Geisberger v. WilluhnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Gaertner v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API