Legal Opinion

Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique v. Samsung Electronics Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 16, 2007No. Civil Action No. 03-484-MPTPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (“CEA”) objected to the Report and Recommendations (“Report”) (D.I. 659) of the Special Master issued on May 12, 2006.1 The Report resulted from a request by then defendant AU Optronics Corporation (“AUO”) to compel production of communications relating to the prosecution of French patents, many of which related to the those underlying the patents-in-suit.2 CEA asserts that those documents are shielded from production on the basis of French law on privilege and contends that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  3. International Paper Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  4. Mcmahan, Jr. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Taberer v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. HezbollahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API