Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (“CEA”) objected to the Report and Recommendations (“Report”) (D.I. 659) of the Special Master issued on May 12, 2006.1 The Report resulted from a request by then defendant AU Optronics Corporation (“AUO”) to compel production of communications relating to the prosecution of French patents, many of which related to the those underlying the patents-in-suit.2 CEA asserts that those documents are shielded from production on the basis of French law on privilege and contends that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- International Paper Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Mcmahan, Jr. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Taberer v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaplan v. HezbollahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.