Legal Opinion
Taberer v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 23, 1992No. 91-5265PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*891OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant David Weinfeld, a Pennsylvania lawyer, represented the plaintiffs in a number of asbestos cases transferred from the district court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the district court for the District of New Jersey. Weinfeld appeals from an order of a New Jersey district judge adjudging him guilty of criminal contempt, fining him $5,000, and revoking his pro hac vice status in all cases pending before that district judge.
Weinfeld was charged with contempt because he failed to appear on several occasions before the United States…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kaplan v. HezbollahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- In Re Village Craftsman, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- United States v. Debra L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Morrison v. Office of the U.S. Trustee (In Re Morrison)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.