Rasnake v. Board of County Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Because we see a fundamental difference between the facts in this case and those in Hewitt v. Baltimore County, 220 Md. 48, 151 A. 2d 144 (1959), and Walker v. Talbot County, 208 Md. 72, 116 A. 2d 393 (1955), relied upon by a trial judge in concluding that Cecil County fully complied with the provisions relative to notice of a proposed change in its zoning ordinance, we shall reverse that determination.
The Cecil County zoning ordinance had permitted “ [t] emporary buildings and uses for construction purposes” in any zone “when approved by the Board of Appeals” subject to certain restrictions,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hewitt v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Nottingham Village, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Walker v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Ark Readi-Mix Concrete Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Swarthmore Co. v. KaestnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hirsch v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- McLay v. Maryland Assemblies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Ferguson v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- von Lusch v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- O'Donnell v. Basslers, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.