Legal Opinion
Nottingham Village, Inc. v. Baltimore County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 1, 1972No. [No. 14 (Adv.), September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
Nottingham Village, Inc. (Nottingham) and The Rouse Company (Rouse) which are respectively the owner of a 930 acre tract located in Baltimore County (the County) and the lessee of a 150 acre parcel of the same tract, believing themselves aggrieved by a comprehensive Zoning Map adopted by the County Council on 24 March 1971, filed a bill of complaint in the County’s circuit court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. From a decree dismissing the bill of complaint, Nottingham and Rouse have appealed.
Both the facts of the case and the issues presented are enormously complex. The crux of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Hewitt v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Huff v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- County Commissioners v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Matter of Estate of HermSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.