Legal Opinion

United States v. Jordan

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

The defendant, James A. Jordan, and Michael Newheile, residents of Lock Haven, Pa., were indicted by a grand jury in the Northern district of Ohio, Eastern division, for conspiring to violate the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA), commonly known as the “Volstead Act.” The defendant was arrested and, after hearing before United States Commissioner James Peck, at Scranton, Pa., was held in bail on October 6, 1927, by the commissioner for trial in the Northern district of Ohio, Eastern division. ’

On October 6, 1927, Andrew B. Duns-more, United States attorney for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. In Re PalliserSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Beavers v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Benson v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.District Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Jodeci Vanorden, et al. v. ECP Optometry Services LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API