Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 26, 1944No. Cr. A. No. 296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

This matter is here on motions to quash and demurrers to an information charging defendants with violation of an Act of Congress, 56 Stat. 1087, approved December 24, 1942, 18 U.S.C.A. § 420f. ' The pertinent provisions of the Act provide:

“[That] it shall be unlawful, in the course of the conduct of a business of constructing or supplying dentures from casts or impressions sent through the mails * * * to use the mails * * * for the purpose of sending or bringing into any State or Territory the laws of which prohibit — * * *
“(2) the construction or supply of dentures by a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States v. ResnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. In Re PalliserSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Prussian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946
  4. In Re Phillips'petitionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API