Legal Opinion

Narvin Lichfield v. Katherine Kubler and Netflix, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 17, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00458Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NARVIN LICHFIELD, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN Plaintiff, PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES v. Case No. 2:24-cv-00458-JNP KATHERINE KUBLER and NETFLIX, INC., Chief Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendants. Narvin Lichfield sued Katherine Kubler and Netflix, Inc. (collectively, the defendants), alleging that a documentary series created by Kubler and streamed on Netflix defamed him. The court determined that the defendants were entitled to relief under both the California Anti-SLAPP Act, CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API