Legal Opinion

Hyden v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Hamilton County. — S. D. McEeynolds, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geeeet

The plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted for alleged larceny of copper wire, from the Chattanooga Traction Company, and has appealed in error to this court.

There is no controversy .in the proof, and the single question presented, in various ways, is whether the offense, shown to have been committed by Hyden, amounts to larceny.

The Chattanooga Traction Company operates a trolley line from North Chattanooga to Signal Mountain, over a right of way which it owns. Copper wire is used as a bond to tie the rails one to another, and also to connect the rails on opposite sides of the track.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Potter Realty Co. v. DerbyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. DonahueOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hickman v. BoothTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Lewisberg & Northern R. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McDaniel v. Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  3. Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. GemmaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API