Legal Opinion

Moody v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 15, 2011No. AC 31206PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The petitioner, Donald Moody, appeals following the habeas court’s granting of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly rejected his claims of (1) ineffective assistance of trial counsel, (2) instructional error at his criminal trial and (3) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in his direct appeal. Each of these claims is predicated on the same underlying claims of instructional error, namely, that the jury instructions improperly (a)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moody v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. Cator v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Camacho v. Commissioner of Correction.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  5. State v. Ruiz-PachecoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API