Legal Opinion

Anaya v. Holly Sugar Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1996No. 95-277PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only real issue in this case is whether the record discloses sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of a hearing examiner acting for the Wyoming Workers’ Safety and Compensation Division (Division) that Jose M. Anaya (Anaya) should be awarded permanent partial disability benefits of 7% for physical impairment and 20% for vocational loss. Anaya complains of a failure to award permanent total disability based upon the odd-lot doctrine. He has parsed the case into a number of sub-issues, but all of them fit within the substantial evidence mold. We hold that'the decision…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schepanovich v. United States Steel Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cardin v. Morrison-KnudsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Workers' Compensation Claim of Moss v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development CenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Worker's Compensation Claim of Stevens v. State Ex Rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Tyler L. Stallman v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Marty D. McIntosh v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API