Legal Opinion

Boyark v. Czajka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Crew III, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

As a pistol licensing officer, respondent is vested with broad discretion in ruling on permit applications and may deny such applications for good cause (see, Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 AD2d 885; Matter of King v Ingraham, 113 AD2d 977). Based upon our review of the record as a whole, in particular the testimony adduced at the hearing conducted in this matter, we cannot say that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MogaveroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. King v. IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Davis v. ClyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Novick v. HilleryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vale v. EidensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Bando v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API