Legal Opinion

Vale v. Eidens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 2002PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to review, inter alia, a determination of respondent Schenectady County Judge which denied petitioner’s application for a pistol permit.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding commenced in this Court, *613petitioner challenges the denial of his pistol permit application by respondent Schenectady County Judge (hereinafter respondent), as well as the denial of access to his permit application file by respondent Schenectady County Clerk. Finding no merit to any of the contentions raised by petitioner, we find…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. JeantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Dlugosz v. ScaranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Grossman v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. DiMonda v. BristolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Servedio v. BrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kachalsky v. County of WestchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Bach v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Bach v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Aron v. BeckerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
  5. Kachalsky v. CacaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API