Boorstein v. Massachusetts Port Authority
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiffs, owners of three vacant parcels of land in East Boston, brought this action in the Land Court to quiet title to those premises. At issue is whether a pipeline easement taken in 1943 by the United States of America, and now purportedly held by the Massachusetts Port Authority (authority), still exists. The case was presented on a stipulation of facts which incorporated various documents. The judge ruled that the authority owned a pipeline easement over the plaintiffs’ land and that the easement had not been extinguished. We affirm the judgment which dismissed the action.
On March…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Higginson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Brassard v. FlynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Spear v. BicknellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'Donovan v. McIntoshSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Bateman v. Board of Appeals of GeorgetownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Canova v. Shell Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- LaFargue v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
- Abington Ltd. Partnership v. Heublein, No. X01-Cv92-0151749 S (May 18, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999