Rager v. Johnstown Traction Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Hirt, J.:
The majority opinion in this case is disturbing.
Whether a marriage contract has been established is always a mixed question of law and of fact. And here, notwithstanding the findings of basic facts in favor of the claimant, we may not ignore our duty to scrutinize the evidence to determine whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence supplying all of the legal essentials of a valid common law marriage. Baker v. Mitchell et al., 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 50, 17 A. 2d 738. Even in workmen’s compensation cases there must be substantial credible testimony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baker v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Stevenson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Estate of MurdockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Craig's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.