Legal Opinion

Haney v. Purcell Co., Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 9, 1990No. 01-87-00909-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT

O’CONNOR, Justice.

Samuel and Judith Haney, appellants, sued Purcell Company, appellee, for negligence, breach of implied warranties, fraud, and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA). After a jury trial, the court entered a take-nothing judgment against the Haneys, based on the jury findings.

The Haneys appealed, asserting eight points of error. We overruled their fifth point of error, in an unpublished opinion dated June 9, 1988, because the Haneys did not properly object during trial, and therefore waived…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pirtle v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. McKinney v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Till v. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  2. Stephanz v. Laird, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Centex Homes v. BuecherTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Vaughan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  5. Halim v. Ramchandani, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API