Legal Opinion
Daury v. Ferraro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 28, 1928PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
This action is brought to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have occurred in Massachusetts through the negligence of the defendants, who pleaded as a special defense that at the time of the injury complained of there was in force §9 of Chapter 346 of the Acts and Resolves of Massachusetts for the year 1925, to wit: “A person who by his negligence or by his wilful, wanton or reckless act, or by the negligence or wilful, wanton or reckless act of his agents or servants while engaged in his business, causes the death of a person in the exercise of due care, who…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- McCarthy v. William H. Wood Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Boucher Agency, Inc. v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Burger & Burger, Inc. v. MurrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.