Legal Opinion

People v. Bishop

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1901No. Crim. No. 665PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of unlawfully and maliciously burning and destroying his dwelling-house and certain of its contents, situate in the city of Oakland, with intent to defraud the insurers of said property, and was sentenced to imprisonment for five years in the state prison.

It is not claimed that the evidence did not justify the verdict. A new trial is asked on the ground of certain alleged errors committed by the court during the progress of the trial.

1. There was evidence, that in each of two of the rooms in the upper portion of the house, in one of which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. ArrighiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. CorriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. SieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. GosdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. LawlorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API