Legal Opinion

Bugryn v. City of Bristol, No. Cv98-0488051s (Jan. 31, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 31, 2000No. Nos. CV98-0488051S, CV99-0495681S, CV99-0495682SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs, Frank W. Bugryn, Jr., Nellie Fillipetti, Mary Dudko, Michael Dudko and John Bugryn1 brought this action against the defendant, city of Bristol (the city), to restrain the city and its duly authorized municipal agencies, the Bristol Developmental Authority and the Bristol Planning Commission, from taking, in the name of the city, their properties located in the State Route 229 corridor of Bristol for the construction of an industrial park facility pursuant to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Karls v. Alexandra Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API