Henry v. Kuney
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
In January of 1935 the present plaintiffs began a friendly suit against the present defendants to determine the validity of certain games of amusement and skill. A hearing was had on January 10, 1935, at which time the trial judge defined a gaming or gambling machine as, “Any machine, device or apparatus, by the operation or use of which the customer, purchaser or player anticipates a chance gain either in money or merchandise beyond a fair exchange (after allowing for reasonable profit) for the amount of money invested, is a gambling device that violates the statute. ’ ’ Following this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Moberly v. DeskinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- State v. GooginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Snyder v. City of AllianceOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Automatic Music & Vending Corp. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Oatman v. Port Huron Chief of PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Gibson v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- MICHIGAN Ex Rel COMMISSIONER OF STATE POLICE v. NINE MONEY FALL GAMESMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.