Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Martin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1944No. Docket No. 16, Calendar No. 42,310PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is a suit for the specific performance of a contract. In May, 1941, plaintiff, doing business as Gibson Specialty Company, entered into an agreement with defendant whereby Gibson Specialty Company was given the “sole and exclusive right for a period of 13 years to own and operate any and all pin-ball or other coin-operated amusement machines, in any and all places of business owned or operated by the * * * (defendant) and any and all other places of business the * * * (defendant) may in the future own, control or operate where such machines may be placed. ’ ’ The pin-ball games were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Henry v. KuneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oatman v. Port Huron Chief of PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Thamart v. MolineIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  3. International Recovery Systems, Inc. v. GablerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Hicks v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. International Recovery Systems, Inc v. GablerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API