Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Banks' Admr.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 8, 1911PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appéal from Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Affirming.

In this action by .the administrator of Celia Banks to recover damages for her death alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellant railway company and its employes, a number of reasons are presented by counsel for the company why the judgment in favor of appellee against it should he reversed. But, before entering upon a discussion of tbe facts, and tbe errors alleged to have been committed during tbe trial, we will dispose of tbe question raised — tbat tbe case should bave been removed to tbe Federal court on tbe motion and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Broadway Coal Mining Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Pirtle's Administratrix v. Hargis Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Outland's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Cox v. Colossal Cavern CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Haynes' Admrs. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API