Legal Opinion
Pirtle's Administratrix v. Hargis Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 10, 1931PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Richardson
Reversing for new trial.
This appeal requires a construction and application of section 466 and 2059a-10, Ky. Statutes, as Jto the appellee Hargis Bank & Trust Company, on the facts alleged in appellant’s petition and ' amended petition, and as to the appellee A. H. Hargis on the alleged and proven facts. The action was instituted against them by the administratrix of J. E. Pirtle to recover damages for his death, alleged to have resulted directly and proximately from their operation, without its being equipped as required by sections 2059a.-5 2059a-6,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Campbell v. Portland Sugar Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
- Mayer v. Thompson-Hutchison BuildIng Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Mullins v. NordlowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Milbrath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pike v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Haupt v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Smith v. IsaacsKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Lambert Ex Rel. Lambert v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Rietze v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.