Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 11, 1982No. 63188PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Senior Judge.

Defendant was charged by amended information with burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, kidnapping, and attempted robbery. He gave notice of his intent to rely on the defense, authorized by § 562.076, RSMo, that he was in a drugged condition which was involuntarily produced and which deprived him of the capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform it to the requirements of the law. On that basis defendant asserted that he was not criminally responsible for his conduct.

Defendant waived his right to trial by a jury and the cause…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Charles FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Bartholomew v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State v. SeelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. People v. QuinnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SextonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. State v. ShieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. ElamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. BurroughsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. SamuelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API