Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Southern Lumber & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 24, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

Crutchfield & Jeffus, contractors, had a separate contract with each of three school districts to erect school building’s. There was a contract with the Gregory district, another with the Hilleman and another with the Howell-Wiville. The contractors entered into a bond for the faithful performance of their contracts as provided by statute. There was one bond in each case. The appellant, however, was surety in each of the bonds. The buildings were erected and the contractors gave checks for the amount due to all the creditors. The bank declined to pay any of the checks because funds of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Briggs v. SteeleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Salt Lake City v. O'ConnorUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Wyandotte Coal & Mining Co. v. Wyandotte Paving & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. United Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Reserve Insurance Company v. Joseph Y. GayleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  3. The White River Production Credit Assn. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Wilson v. Morse Mill Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Choctaw, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API