Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Fayetteville Area System of Transportation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8510IC381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the critical findings of fact made and the conclusion reached by the Commission. In passing upon an appeal from an award of the Industrial Commission, our review is limited to the following questions of law: (1) whether there was any competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact; and (2) whether the findings of fact of the Commission justify its legal conclusions and decision. Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 283 S.E. 2d 101 (1981).

The Commission is required to make specific findings of fact as to each material fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simon v. Triangle Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Jackson v. Fayetteville Area System of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Jenkins v. Easco AluminumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Jackson v. L.G. DeWitt Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Crowder v. Preston Trucking Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API