Legal Opinion

Application of Jurgeleit

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 29, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5823PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Judge.

' By this appeal appellant seeks reversal of the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of all the claims, numbered respectively 4, 9, and 10, in appellant’s application, serial No. 717,230, for a patent “For Molding Apparatus.”

In the specification it is said: “One use to which my improved method and apparatus are particularly applicable is in the manufacture of vibration dampers. Such dampers are constructed with a central metal hub and outer concentric pulley or sleeve spaced from the hub, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. In re HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In re SlateCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. In Re FarrandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. In re TaylersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tipper Tie, Inc. v. Hercules Fasteners, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
  2. Application of Bernard HarmonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API